Abstract
Domestic migrant workers were stranded far from home when India declared nationwide lockdown to combat the pandemic of novel coronavirus (COVID-19). A large number of these workers were left with no economic support, no food and in many cases nowhere to live. The pandemic posed a serious health threat to these people, and the socioeconomic insecurity pushed them towards the edge of sustainability. Many of the migrants began walking home and accepted an uncertain fate if they could not return back home. The Government of India initiated efforts to provide transport support with special train services from the beginning of May 2020. While the migrants have started to return to their villages and towns, the states are facing the challenges of preventing the spread of COVID-19. The point-of-entry screening, quarantine and isolation facilities have increased substantially in capacity, although the quality of care remains a point of concern. Back at their homes, the migrants are enduring stigma, discrimination and poor social security. In order to avert the brewing humanitarian crisis, empathetic administration combined with political will is a must. Prudent, evidence-based decision-making in the economic and health sectors is also necessary.
Highlights
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the resulting travel restrictions, lockdown and panic trapped a large number of migrant workers from Cambodia, Myanmar and other countries in Thailand, where they had been working in local industries and in tourism
All means to take care to the doorstep of those at the lower end of the equity spectrum should be used to handle this developing crisis
Summary
The current article is a commentary on the national scenario regarding the migrant workers who are returning back home after a stretched Lock-down. This article do not take into account any individual level data from any individual. This is not a research article comprising of first-hand or secondary data collection. This article infers on the available published evidences. It was not considered necessary for approval by Institutional Ethics Committee.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.