Abstract
AbstractThis chapter deals with the issue of standard of review relating to domestic law. The crucial question is to what extent and with what intensity a panel should review the interpretation of domestic law and, if not convinced, come up with its own interpretative conclusion. Section I examines the panels' and the Appellate Body's jurisdiction to decide on the correct interpretation and application of domestic law. Section II turns to the case law concerning standards of review. For methodological purposes, the practice is reviewed case-by-case before the common traits are filtered out. Section III summarizes the practice and critically assesses it in the light of general standard-of-review principles.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
