Abstract

I study the limits of mediated conflict resolution when: states have incentives to misrepresent private information; mediators may have limited capacity to enforce agreement; and political leaders in crisis bargaining situations are subject to domestic constraints. With a mechanism design approach, I characterize the conditions for the existence of peaceful settlements as a weighed resource budget constraint. I examine how the (lack of) enforcement capacity may impact mediators’ ability to implement peaceful settlements. When the existence conditions fail, I establish strict monotonicity theorems about leaders’ war-propensity and payoff, and derive their implications on the design of optimal domestic constraints in general crisis bargaining games.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.