Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare beneficiation policy between oil, coal, gas and metal mining sector in Indonesia. The empirical fact shows Indonesias Constitution of 1945 stated that natural resources in Indonesia are controlled by the state to be exploited to the greatest benefit of the people. However, Indonesias prevailing law has varied interpretation of this term. This is shown in differentiation of beneficiation policy between oil, coal, gas and metal mining sector in Indonesia despite the same philosophical basis of the utilization itself. This study explains the difference of interpretation under Indonesias Law regarding natural resources beneficiation and how it is furtherly implemented in the sector. This research is normative in nature, using literature study to gather data. The conclusion of this study is metal mining sector is the only sector whom ready to implement domestic mineral beneficiation obligation. While in other sector, Indonesian government and mining stakeholders are not ready to take the risks to establish beneficiation dependency.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
