Abstract

Many modern zoos strive to create connections between guests and animals through animal visitor interaction (AVI) programs. However, there has been relatively little research into the effect of AVI programs on the welfare of program animals. Previous research has revealed three factors that may affect AVI program animal welfare: species differences, handling and transport, and the provision of choice and control. We assessed the effects of an AVI program designed with these factors in mind on the behavior of a flock (N = 16) of zoo-housed domestic chickens (Gallus gallus). Behavioral data were collected on program days and on non-program (control) days, and we considered the time leading up to the program, the program itself, and the time immediately following the program. When comparing flock behavior on program days to control days, we found no differences in behavioral indicators of welfare during the time leading up to the program and during the program. Rates of aggression, however, were significantly greater after the program had concluded compared to the same time period on matched control days, but still occurred infrequently. Additionally, we recorded the spatial location of each animal while the program occurred and found that the chickens did not spend significantly more or less time in the feeding zone as visitor participation increased, although there were individual differences within the flock. We conclude that the relatively small behavioral changes seen were not indicative of a change in welfare and consider those results in the context of the program design.

Highlights

  • Many modern zoos strive to create connections between guests and animals through animal visitor interaction (AVI) programs

  • We focused this research on the welfare implications of a new ambassador animal program that involved a domestic species, did not involve handling or transport, and provided the animals the choice of whether or not to participate

  • These program characteristics were chosen based on existing literature to set the stage for good animal welfare, and the goal of this study was to determine whether chickens exposed to the program showed any signs of welfare compromise

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many modern zoos strive to create connections between guests and animals through animal visitor interaction (AVI) programs. One study demonstrated no profound impact on behavioral indicators of welfare in a petting zoo exhibit with goats, potbellied pigs, and llamas; all species’ behavior changed as visitor density increased (Farrand et al, 2014). Another recent study reported no welfare compromise for domesticated guinea pigs in a zoobased program (Powell et al, 2020). The authors suggested that the animals did not habituate to handling and transport

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call