Abstract

A number of jurisdictions in Australia have introduced special provisions that either displace or reverse the presumption in favour of bail where domestic and family violence offences are alleged. This article examines the different approaches taken to bail in domestic violence cases across Australia in order to consider how to strike the best balance between protecting victims of family violence and upholding the rights of the accused. This article concludes that many of the legislative changes to bail presumptions are unjustified and that the safety of victims can be sufficiently protected by a focus on the basic assessment of whether the risk that the accused will harm the victim is unacceptable, and on a careful consideration and appropriate tailoring of the conditions of the bail grant.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.