Abstract

PurposeOur key objective is to identify the core domains of health-related quality of life (QoL). Health-related QoL utility scales are commonly used in economic evaluations to assess the effectiveness of health-care interventions. However, health-care interventions are likely to affect QoL in a broader sense than is quantifiable with traditional scales. Therefore, measures need to go beyond these scales. Unfortunately, there is no consensus in the scientific literature on the essential domains of QoL.MethodsWe conducted a three-stage online Delphi consensus procedure to identify the key domains of health-related QoL. Five stakeholder groups (i.e., patients, family of patients, clinicians, scientists and general public) were asked, on three consecutive occasions, what they perceive as the most important domains of health-related QoL. An analysis of existing (health-related) QoL and well-being measurements formed the basis of the Delphi-procedure.ResultsIn total, 42 domains of QoL were judged, covering physical, mental and social aspects. All participants rated ‘self-acceptance’, ‘self-esteem’ and ‘good social contacts’ as essential. Strikingly, mental and social domains are perceived as more essential than physical domains across stakeholders groups.ConclusionsIn traditionally used health-related QoL utility measures, physical domains like ‘mobility’ are prominently present. The Delphi-procedure shows that health-related QoL (utility) scales need to put sufficient emphasis on mental and social domains to capture aspects of QoL that are essential to people.

Highlights

  • Evaluating the benefits of health treatments can assist the allocation of scarce health-care resources by maximizing health benefits

  • M. de Vries Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands health-related quality of life (QoL) scales need to put sufficient emphasis on mental and social domains to capture aspects of QoL that are essential to people

  • We did use a broad and general conceptual framework to structure the extensive number of domains we found during our search; we used the definition of health of the World Health Organization (WHO) [19] as guidance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Evaluating the benefits of health treatments can assist the allocation of scarce health-care resources by maximizing health benefits. Used scales to assess health-related quality of life (QoL) are generic utility measures, like the EQ-5D [3]. These QoL measures provide utilities for different levels of a predefined set of domains (e.g., mobility). An increasingly common critique is that such utility measures are too narrowly focused and do not capture all domains relevant to QoL [4, 5] These measures mainly focus on determining the physical effects of cure-related treatments and do not detect important effects of healthcare interventions in the care-sector on mental and social domains of QoL [6, 7].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call