Abstract
Advanced machine learning techniques have been used in remote sensing (RS) applications such as crop mapping and yield prediction, but remain under-utilized for tracking crop progress. In this study, we demonstrate the use of agronomic knowledge of crop growth drivers in a Long Short-Term Memory-based, domain-guided neural network (DgNN) for in-season crop progress estimation. The DgNN uses a branched structure and attention to separate independent crop growth drivers and captures their varying importance throughout the growing season. The DgNN is implemented for corn, using RS data in Iowa, U.S., for the period 2003–2019, with United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) crop progress reports used as ground truth. State-wide DgNN performance shows significant improvement over sequential and dense-only NN structures, and a widely-used Hidden Markov Model method. The DgNN had a 4.0% higher Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency over all growth stages and 39% more weeks with highest cosine similarity than the next best NN during test years. The DgNN and Sequential NN were more robust during periods of abnormal crop progress, though estimating the Silking–Grainfill transition was difficult for all methods. Finally, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection visualizations of layer activations showed how LSTM-based NNs separate crop growth time-series differently from a dense-only structure. Results from this study exhibit both the viability of NNs in crop growth stage estimation (CGSE) and the benefits of using domain knowledge. The DgNN methodology presented here can be extended to provide near-real time CGSE of other crops.
Highlights
The Domain-guided Neural Networks (NNs) (DgNN) separates inputs that can be treated as independent crop growth drivers using a branched structure, and uses attention mechanisms to account for the varying importance of inputs during the growing season
The DgNN structure was compared to a Hidden Markov Model-based (HMM) and two NN structures of similar complexity
The DgNN outperformed each of the other methods on all growth stages for five-fold cross validation on the training data, with an average improvement in Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) across all stages of 22% versus the HMM and 2.2% versus the best NN
Summary
High-resolution Remote Sensing (RS) data have been successfully employed to track crop growth at regional scales; current methods for CGSE utilize curvefitting and simplistic Machine Learning (ML) models cannot describe the more complex relationships between crop growth drivers and crop growth stage progress [4,5,6,7,8]. Many of these methods require full-season data and do not provide in-season CGSE information
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.