Abstract

The authors sought to identify correctable reasons for the failed completion of required billing elements necessary for the reimbursement of services for intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). This was a retrospective study. This study was completed at a single institution and large academic center. The patient population included all adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery at a single academic center over one year. This retrospective review of TEE documentation and billing data was performed for the all adults undergoing cardiac surgery over the course of one year. Documentation characteristics were compared between examinations that were reimbursed and those that were not. Out of 504 TEE examinations, 30% were not reimbursed. For these examinations, there was a lower compliance in the completion of minimum billing requirements, compared with those that were reimbursed; designation as "diagnostic" (29% v 93%, respectively, p < 0.0001), procedure note (70% v 99%, p < 0.0001), and procedure order (67% v 98%, p=0.0002). The total estimated annual loss in revenue was $36,000. Understanding documentation requirements for TEE is an overlooked but important part of anesthesiology practice that may lead to substantial cost savings. Completion of a procedure note, procedure order, and documentation of an examination as "diagnostic" was associated with successful billing.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.