Abstract

Europe has set out its plans to foster a ‘green economy’, focused around recycling, by 2020. This pan-European recycling economy, it is argued, will have the triple virtues of: first, stopping wastes being ‘dumped’ on poor countries; second, reusing them and thus decoupling economic prosperity from demands on global resources; and third, creating a wave of employment in recycling industries. European resource recovery is represented in academic and practitioner literatures as ‘clean and green’. Underpinned by a technical and physical materialism, it highlights the clean-up of Europe’s waste management and the high-tech character of resource recovery. Analysis shows this representation to mask the cultural and physical associations between recycling work and waste work, and thus to obscure that resource recovery is mostly ‘dirty’ work. Through an empirical analysis of three sectors of resource recovery (‘dry recyclables’, textiles and ships) in Northern member states, we show that resource recovery is a new form of dirty work, located in secondary labour markets and reliant on itinerant and migrant labour, often from accession states. We show therefore that, when wastes stay put within the EU, labour moves to process them. At the micro scale of localities and workplaces, the reluctance of local labour to work in this new sector is shown to connect with embodied knowledge of old manufacturing industries and a sense of spatial injustice. Alongside that, the positioning of migrant workers is shown to rely on stereotypical assumptions that create a hierarchy, connecting reputational qualities of labour with the stigmas of different dirty jobs – a hierarchy upon which those workers at the apex can play.

Highlights

  • The recovery of secondary materials, or resources, for recycling within the European Union (EU) has become central in the drive to the greening of European economies

  • EU environmental regulations may suggest that former shipbuilding areas in the EU offer the most appropriate infrastructure for ship recycling operations, and green economy documents point to job creation in former industrial areas (EEA, 2011), but local labour is often unwilling to take up jobs in the industry, even in areas where there are relatively high levels of unemployment

  • In terms of the recycling labour process: this paper has demonstrated that resource recovery, wherever it occurs, with whatever materials, continues to require manual labour

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The recovery of secondary materials, or resources, for recycling within the European Union (EU) has become central in the drive to the greening of European economies. A consequence is that little or no attention has been paid to how value is created from paid labour, which does the work of resource recovery or recycling the collected materials.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.