Abstract

One of the most prominent illustrations of the challenges and complexities faced by companies operating in weak governance zones has been that of AngloGold Ashanti (AGA) in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). A payment made by AGA exploration staff to a rebel group accused of committing extensive human rights abuses was seen by leading non‐governmental organisations as an illustration of corporate irresponsibility and was used to argue that companies such as AGA should not be operating in such areas in the first place. The company admitted that a mistake had been made, but argued that the interests of local people and the DRC in general are better served by its remaining in the area. This case study argues that investing and re‐entering the DRC during the period of conflict was an incorrect decision and that a more risk‐averse approach ought to guide investment decisions in such circumstances. The company's decision to remain in the area is difficult to assess, though there are indications that it is contributing to improved governance by establishing a local multi‐stakeholder forum and, at the national level, support for the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.