Abstract
Early definitions of ageism as prejudice, attitudes and discrimination tend to stress the cognitive aspects of the processes where groups of people are being marginalized and/or excluded because of their age. This differ from recurrent studies which emphazise social categorization such as age and gender as a dynamic social positioning practice and as a complex form of doing age as marginalization and exclusion. Based on qualitative interviews with eleven men between the ages of 56 and 74, who work with manual labour at a steel company in Sweden, this paper discusses the processes where age normality and ageism are constructed in parallel. Departing from the concept age coding; distinctive practices associating a context or a phenomenon with demarcated ages, it shows the disciplining dimension of ageism. The paper concludes with a reflection on the central position which ageism can have in neo-liberal governance by creating social insecurity among older workers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
