Abstract
Few studies assess dog ownership and walking with both self-reported or perceived and audited or objective walkability and physical activity measures. Across two years, we examined both types of walkability and activity measures for residents living within 2km of a “complete street”—one renovated with light rails, bike lanes, and sidewalks. Audited walkability (Irvine–Minnesota Inventory) was more consistently related to dog ownership and walking groups than perceived walkability (Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale—Abbreviated). Self-reported leisure walking was much higher (289–383 min per week) among dog walkers than among other groups (100–270 min per week), despite no difference in accelerometer-measured light or moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Furthermore, the most powerful difference between groups involved single-family detached home residence, which was much lower among non-dog-owners (44%) than among non-dog-walkers or dog walkers (81% and 70%, respectively). Given discrepancies across walkability and activity measures, we recommend future use of walkability audits and objectively measured physical activity over the current emphasis on self-report measures. We also urge greater attention to increased densities of housing, which may negatively affect dog ownership levels unless compensating supports for dog ownership and walking are created by public health messaging, dog-friendly policies, and dog-friendly housing and community design.
Highlights
Dogs provide important sources of psychological and behavioral benefits for their human companions [1,2,3]
The current study revealed a number of relationships between walkability and physical activity among our three groups: non-dog-owners, non-dog-walkers, and dog walkers
More audited walkability than perceived walkability indicators were related to dog owning and walking groups
Summary
Dogs provide important sources of psychological and behavioral benefits for their human companions [1,2,3]. Research has focused on the human health benefits from dog walking. One of the key published articles that encourages modern dog walking research underscores the need to focus on benefits to dogs as well [4]. Finding sufficient humans to adopt needy dogs is a continuing challenge, with the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) reporting that 670,000 of the 3.3 million dogs admitted to shelters are euthanized [5]. We argue that for the well-being of both dogs and humans, it is important to understand what predicts owning a dog as well as what predicts walking a dog. We examine demographic, design, and physical activity variables that distinguish non-dog-owners from non-dog-walkers (i.e., dog owners who do not walk their dogs) and dog walkers in neighborhoods near downtown Salt Lake City, Utah
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
