Does Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Offer Improved Clinical Advantages Over Total Knee Replacement in the Treatment of Isolated Lateral Osteoarthritis? A Matched Cohort Analysis From an Independent Center

Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to compare the functional and radiographic results, perioperative complications, satisfaction rate, and mid-term survivorship after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of lateral compartmental knee osteoarthritis (LCKO). MethodsBetween March 2007 and September 2017, we identified 35 patients with primary TKAs and 121 patients with lateral UKAs (LUKAs) for LCKO with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (mean 5.3 years, range 2-12.4). The matched variables were age, gender, operation side, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologist grade, initial diagnosis, osteoarthritis grade in lateral compartment, and follow-up time. All patients were assessed using the Oxford Knee Score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, range of motion, length of hospital stay, satisfaction, and complications. Survivorship of UKA and TKA implants was also compared. ResultsAt last follow-up, LUKA had a significantly better postoperative Oxford Knee Score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, range of motion, shorter length of hospital time, and higher satisfaction rate than matched TKA group. There were significant differences regarding patellar tendon injury (P = .043), superficial wound infection (P = .028), patellar snapping or impingement (P = .047), and stiffness (P < .001). Five-year survivorships free from revision were similar in both groups (99.2% vs 97.1%, P = .347). ConclusionLUKA for LCKO demonstrated more favorable 5-year results in comparison with TKA. Furthermore, LUKA achieved comparable mid-term survivorship and was less likely to suffer from wound infection and knee stiffness, although not overall surgical complications.