Abstract

Wearable sensor technology already has a great impact on the endurance running community. Smartwatches and heart rate monitors are heavily used to evaluate runners’ performance and monitor their training progress. Additionally, foot-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs) have drawn the attention of sport scientists due to the possibility to monitor biomechanically relevant spatio-temporal parameters outside the lab in real-world environments. Researchers developed and investigated algorithms to extract various features using IMU data of different sensor positions on the foot. In this work, we evaluate whether the sensor position of IMUs mounted to running shoes has an impact on the accuracy of different spatio-temporal parameters. We compare both the raw data of the IMUs at different sensor positions as well as the accuracy of six endurance running-related parameters. We contribute a study with 29 subjects wearing running shoes equipped with four IMUs on both the left and the right shoes and a motion capture system as ground truth. The results show that the IMUs measure different raw data depending on their position on the foot and that the accuracy of the spatio-temporal parameters depends on the sensor position. We recommend to integrate IMU sensors in a cavity in the sole of a running shoe under the foot’s arch, because the raw data of this sensor position is best suitable for the reconstruction of the foot trajectory during a stride.

Highlights

  • Wearables have become increasingly important in many fields of our everyday life.Among applications in medicine, workplaces, and many others, the sports domain was one of the early adopters of wearable technology

  • For the parameters stride length and average stride velocity which are based on the computed translation, we see that the cavity sensor outperforms the other sensor positions with respect to both the median and the interquartile ranges (IQRs)

  • We presented an evaluation of the effects of four different inertial measurement units (IMUs) sensor positions on the accuracy of IMU-based endurance running parameters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Workplaces, and many others, the sports domain was one of the early adopters of wearable technology. The reasons for the quick spread of small body-worn sensors in sports was due to the manifold advantages of the technology for athletes, researchers, and the sports industry. Athletes can utilize low-cost sensor technologies in order to enhance their performance, prevent injuries, and improve their motivation [1]. Sports research benefits from the fact that wearables allow in field data acquisitions, whereas many studies in the sports domain were traditionally laboratory bound [2]. The sports industry can, on the one hand, offer innovative and more attractive sports products with integrated sensor technology, and, on the other hand, gather consumer data which they can use to improve their products

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call