Abstract
Asymptomatic cerebral embolus (ACE) detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has been reported at varying rates with different ablation techniques. To evaluate the incidence of ACE after phased radiofrequency ablation for AF with procedural modifications that potentially reduce the embolic load. One hundred twenty consecutive patients with AF underwent MRI before ablation, 24 hours after ablation, and at 4-6 weeks. In all patients, simultaneous activation of pulmonary vein ablation catheter electrode pairs 1 and 5 was forbidden. While in 60 group 1 patients, a maximum of 4 electrode pairs could be activated at a time, and in 60 group 2 patients, ablation was limited to a maximum of 2 pairs. All patients were on uninterrupted phenprocoumon, with an attempted activated clotting time of >300 seconds during ablation. Both patient groups were comparable. A total of 28 DW-positive lesions were detected in 24 of 120 patients (20%). Seventeen group 1 patients (28.3%) were positive for new asymptomatic DW cerebral lesions compared with 7 group 2 patients (11.7%) (P = .039). During MRI follow-up, 3 patients (2.5%) were diagnosed with a small T2-positive asymptomatic glial scar. Procedure time was longer in group 2 patients than in group 1 patients (159 ± 39 vs 121 ± 15; P < .001). Limiting the number of simultaneously activated electrode pairs to 2 significantly reduces the rate of ACE in patients treated with a multielectrode duty-cycled phased radiofrequency catheter system for AF. This reduction corresponds with a significant prolongation of the total procedure time.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.