Does the Location of Endotracheal Intubation Affect the Success of Airway Management in a Helicopter Air Ambulance Service? A Simulation Study

Abstract

ObjectiveAirway management is a cornerstone of helicopter air ambulance patient management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall quality of airway management of critical care crews in 3 common locations for intubation. MethodsThis was a prospective observational simulation study assessing the overall airway management of critical care providers managing simulated patients in an emergency department, helicopter, and ambulance. Composite scores were obtained and compared with respect to physical environment and provider certification level. ResultsFifty-four participants completed the simulations. The median score for the emergency department was 100; for ambulance, it was 80; and for helicopter, it was 80. Ambulance scores were significantly lower than emergency department scores (median difference = −5 points, P = .002) as were helicopter scores (median difference = −10 points, P < .001). The small sample size limited the statistical power to detect differences in provider type, and no statistically significant differences were found in these groups. ConclusionIn this study, the physical location of airway management negatively impacted the overall airway management success as determined by a standardized composite score. This suggests that airway management may have the highest rate of success in an emergency department as opposed to ground ambulance or helicopter air ambulance settings.