Abstract

Because of increased technological complexities and multiple data-exploiting business practices, it is hard for consumers to gain control over their own personal data. Therefore, individual control over personal data has become an important subject in European privacy law. Compared to its predecessor, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) addresses the need for more individual control over personal data more explicitly. With the introduction of several new principles that seem to empower individuals in gaining more control over their data, its changes relative to its predecessors are substantial. It appears, however, that, to increase individual control, data protection law relies on certain assumptions about human decision making. In this work, we challenge these assumptions and describe the actual mechanisms of human decision making in a personal data context. Further, we analyse the extent to which new provisions in the GDPR effectively enhance individual control through a behavioural lens. To guide our analysis, we identify three stages of data processing in the data economy: (1) the information receiving stage, (2) the approval and primary use stage, and (3) the secondary use (reuse) stage. For each stage, we identify the pitfalls of human decision-making that typically emerge and form a threat to individual control. Further, we discuss how the GDPR addresses these threats by means of several legal provisions. Finally, keeping in mind the pitfalls in human decision-making, we assess how effective the new legal provisions are in enhancing individual control. We end by concluding that these legal instruments seem to have made a step towards more individual control, but some threats to individual control remain entrenched in the GDPR.

Highlights

  • Because of increased technological complexities and multiple data-exploiting business practices, it is hard for consumers to gain control over their own personal data

  • We end by concluding that these legal instruments seem to have made a step towards more individual control, but some threats to individual control remain entrenched in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

  • The General Data Protection Regulation emphasises the importance of enhancing individual control in the data economy

Read more

Summary

Individual Control and the GDPR

The progressing of the information age has led to an increase in online transactions concerning consumer data. Because of increased technological complexities and multiple data-exploiting business practices, it is becoming harder for consumers to gain control over their own personal data Observing these trends, behavioural scientists have warned for a number of threats to individual control, such as information overload and data invisibility (Kamleitner and Mitchell 2018). On the mission to enhance individual control, we believe that it is important to take into account the psychology of information processing and decision-making. EU mission to enhance individual control in the data-driven economy by assessing the effectiveness of the GDPR from a behavioural perspective. We state that each stage is associated with certain pitfalls that result from cognitive processing and human decision-making, which pose threats to individual control over personal data. We end with concluding on the effectiveness of the GDPR in enhancing actual individual control over personal data

Provisions in the GDPR That Are Related to Control
Information Overload
Consent requirements Default settings
Information Complexity
The Right to Explanation
Threats to Individual Control at the Approval and Primary Use Stage
Control at the Data Reuse Stage
The Right to Erasure
Findings
Conclusion and Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.