DOES THE ERADICATION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI CURE DUODENAL ULCER DISEASE IN COMMUNITIES WITH A HIGH PREVALENCE RATE? COMPARISON WITH LONG‐TERM ACID SUPPRESSION

Abstract

SUMMARYThe long‐term effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on the natural history of duodenal ulcer has been investigated and compared with long‐term acid suppression treatment in an endemic community for infection. Seventy‐three patients with endoscopically verified H. pylori positive active duodenal ulcer disease were included in this prospective study. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A patients (n=39) were given an omeprazole‐based triple eradication regimen, while group B patients (n=34) were given omeprazole alone followed by long‐term famotidine 20 mg daily as maintenance treatment. A control endoscopy was performed at the third month of treatment. The bacterium was eradicated in 32 (82%) of group A patients. All patients were followed up for two years and an endoscopy performed at the end of each year. H. pylori recurred in 13 patients and the reinfection rate was 44.8% over two years. Duodenal ulcer recurred in seven of these patients at two years (24.1%). There was a close association between H. pylori reinfection and ulcer relapse. Group B patients remained H. pylori positive during the study and the ulcer recurred in five of these patients (16.6%) despite continuous famotidine treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in ulcer relapse rate between the groups. These results suggested that H. pylori eradication is not an absolute solution for duodenal ulcer disease in high endemic regions and continuous maintenance treatment with H2‐receptor antagonists is still an alternative approach in some chronic recurrent cases.