Does the Effect of Replacing Cottonseed Meal with Dried Distiller's Grains on Nellore Bulls Finishing Phase Vary between Pasture and Feedlot?

Ana Cláudia Ruggieri,Rhaony Gonçalves Leite,Ricardo Andrade Reis,Andressa Scholz Berça,Alvair Hoffmann,Maria Luísa Curvelo Silva,Natalia Vilas Boas Fonseca,Abmael Da Silva Cardoso

doi:10.3390/ani11010085

Ana Cláudia Ruggieri, Rhaony Gonçalves Leite + Show 6 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010085

Copy DOI

Abstract

Simple SummaryThe use of less costly products that are not consumed by humans in animal feed has gained increasing attention in the context of sustainable production. Dried distiller’s grains (DDG), a co-product of the production of ethanol from corn, stands out for being efficient in the nutrition of ruminants, meeting both the energy and protein demands of the diets, when the cattle are kept in the pasture or feedlot. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of replacing cottonseed meal (CM) by DDG in two levels (50% (50DDG) and 100% (100DDG)), in terms of efficiency in the productive aspects of cattle finishing phase comparing pasture versus feedlot. The effect of replacing CM by DDG on dry matter, nutrients intake and nutrients digestibility depends on finishing system. While in the pasture system animal consumed more nutrients in the CM, a greater intake was observed in the 100DDG in feedlot. The nutrients digestibility was lower in the pasture. Animal performance and final body weight were higher in the feedlot. The use of DDG does not change the animal performance finished in pasture or feedlot, and it is a viable alternative to replace conventional supplements in finishing phase in both systems in tropical environment.The study aimed to evaluate the effect of replacing cottonseed meal by dried distiller’s grains (DDG) in terms of efficiency in the productive aspects of beef cattle finishing in pasture versus feedlot. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design in a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement, with two production systems (pasture versus feedlot) and three supplements: CM, conventional supplement with cottonseed meal (CM) as a protein source; 50DDG: supplement with 50% replacement of CM by DDG; and 100DDG: 100% replacement. The effect of replacing CM by DDG on dry matter and nutrients intake and nutrients digestibility depends on the finishing system (p < 0.05). While in the pasture system animal consumed more nutrients in the CM, a greater intake was observed in the 100DDG in feedlot. The nutrients digestibility was lower in the pasture (p < 0.05). Animal performance and final body weight were higher in the feedlot (p < 0.0001), with averages of 1.57 kg/d and 566 kg of final body weight (FBW) for feedlot, and 0.99 kg/d and 504 kg FBW for pasture. The use of DDG does not change the animal performance finished in pasture or feedlot, and it is a viable alternative to replace conventional supplements in finishing phase in both systems in tropical environment.

Highlights

The finishing of cattle in feedlot or pasture is a strategy that allows intensive meat production through the exploitation of maximum biological efficiency, combined with the rapid deposition of muscle and fat tissue, which determine greater system productivity [1].The finishing system, can be compromised by the inadequate nutrition of the animal in the growth phase, since the type and quality of the diet determine the supply of the animal’s requirements, which directly reflects on the performance and carcass quality [2]
Animals finished in pasture had higher TDMI, the animal performance was lower for this finishing system when compared to feedlot
The higher TDMI of animals finished in pasture with a diet containing 50% dried distiller’s grains (DDG) compared to animals receiving cottonseed meal (CM) and the other animals finished in feedlot in both diets maybe could provide a higher rate of passage

Summary

Introduction

The finishing system, can be compromised by the inadequate nutrition of the animal in the growth phase, since the type and quality of the diet determine the supply of the animal’s requirements, which directly reflects on the performance and carcass quality [2]. In feedlot there is no such limitation, since feed is offered in quantity and quality according to the purpose of gain. In both systems, the productive response of animals occurs due to the intake, digestibility and metabolism of nutrients directly influenced by the type and quality of the ingredients used [5]

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion