Does the disclosure of key audit matters improve the audit quality for sustainable development: Empirical evidence from China.

Abstract

In this paper, taking the 14837 annual audit reports of 4159 listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2017 to 2020 as samples, and taking the information entropy value of KAM disclosures and the type of audit opinion as the agent indexes of the explanatory variable and the interpreted variable respectively, whether the disclosure of KAMs could improve audit quality had been empirically tested and analyzed. The results shown that: (1) The regression coefficient of information entropy value of KAMs disclosure was 0.1785, which shown a significant positive correlation, and was established at the level of 1% significance, that was to say, KAMs disclosure can improve audit quality. (2) The marginal effect coefficient was only 0.0081, which meant that there was some information redundancy in the KAMs disclosure and the enhancement effect on audit quality was weak. (3) In the robustness test, the interpreted variable was respectively replaced by audit cost (taking the natural logarithm of audit cost) and manipulated accrual profit (taking the absolute value of manipulated accrual profit), the regression coefficients of information entropy of KAMs were 0.0852 and 0.0017 respectively, which shown a significant positive correlation and were consistent with the results of the main regression test. (4) Further research shown that whether the industry in which the audited company was located and whether the audit institution was one of the international Big Four would affect the disclosure of KAMs, and then affect the audit quality in the same direction. The implementation effect of the new audit reporting standards was supported by these test evidences.