Abstract
In literature, 3D-3D superimposition has been widely recognized as a valid method for personal identification. However, very little information is available about possible variability due to differences in protocols of registration of 3D models and calculation of RMS (root mean square) point-to-point distance. Frontal sinuses from 50 CT scans were segmented twice through the ITK-SNAP software and grouped in two samples (1 and 2). Maximum breadth, height and volume were measured. 3D models belonging to the same subject were then superimposed one on each other in 50 matches. In addition, superimposition of 50 random mismatches was performed. For each superimposition, the procedure was repeated four times choosing different reference models both for registration and calculation of RMS. Differences in RMS value among protocols of registration and RMS calculation were assessed through paired Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). Possible correlations between differences in RMS among groups and differences in frontal sinus size between the superimposed models were analysed through calculation of Pearson’s correlation coefficient (p < 0.05). Results showed that RMS calculation did not yield significant differences according to which 3D model is used as reference; on the other hand, RMS values from registration procedure significantly differ according to which model is chosen as reference, but only in the mismatch group (p < 0.001). Differences in RMS value according to RMS calculation are dependent upon all the three measurements, whereas differences according to registration protocols were significantly related only with the breadth of frontal sinuses but only in mismatches (p < 0.001). In no case, superimpositions of RMS values were found between matches and mismatches. This article for the first time proves that the protocol of registration and calculation of RMS significantly influences the results of 3D-3D superimposition only in case of mismatches.
Highlights
In forensic settings, comparison of antemortem (AM) and postmortem (PM) data is essential to reach a positive identification, and usually it is performed through radiological methods
International Journal of Legal Medicine (2021) 135:1879–1886 of the most important advantages brought about by the introduction of CT scan concerns the chance of extracting a 3D model of the chosen anatomical structure, allowing a comparison based on the 3D surface of the anatomical structures, rather than on the mere bi-dimensional silhouette which can be appreciated through CT slice comparison, multiplanar reformation (MPR) process [3] images or conventional radiology
The results described here may provide help for the standardization of this novel technique of comparison and a guidance for choosing the reference model when 3D-3D superimposition is performed for personal identification
Summary
In forensic settings, comparison of antemortem (AM) and postmortem (PM) data is essential to reach a positive identification, and usually it is performed through radiological methods. International Journal of Legal Medicine (2021) 135:1879–1886 of the most important advantages brought about by the introduction of CT scan concerns the chance of extracting a 3D model of the chosen anatomical structure, allowing a comparison based on the 3D surface of the anatomical structures, rather than on the mere bi-dimensional silhouette which can be appreciated through CT slice comparison, multiplanar reformation (MPR) process [3] images or conventional radiology This type of comparison is usually performed through 3D-3D superimposition methods, where 3D models of the anatomical structures extracted from AM and PM CT scans through segmentation [4] are superimposed on each other, with quantification of the difference between the two structures [2, 5,6,7]. This technique represents an important improvement in comparison with traditional 2D-2D comparison usually performed on images from conventional radiology
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
