Does the choice of care pathways matter in timely breast cancer care in Sri Lanka?

Abstract

BackgroundAn understanding on the use of care pathways facilitates identification of timeliness in breast cancer care. Aims of this study were to describe different breast cancer care pathways used by female breast cancer patients in Sri Lanka and to identify whether they experienced timely breast cancer care. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study among 800 female breast cancer patients with a histological/ cytological confirmation, from four state cancer treatment centers. We conceptualized five different care pathways with essential care points and in-between time intervals to be explored using an interviewer administered tool. Dates were cross-checked with the medical record. The difference of time intervals spent in different care pathways was tested for significance using one-way ANOVA test. ResultsMean (SD) age was 55.5 (10.7) years. A vast majority of 98.4 % (n = 787) self-detected the breast lesion, while only 13 had been detected through screening. Following self-detection, two thirds (n = 473, 59.1 %, 95 % CI = 55.7–62.5) had first consulted a primary healthcare physician, and a third n = 287, 35.8 %, 95 % CI = 32.6–39.3) had consulted an appropriate specialist first. Presentation interval among those who visited an Ayurvedic physician first was significantly longer than other pathways (p < 0.0001). Diagnosis interval for those who consulted an appropriate consultant was significantly shorter than other pathways (p < 0.0001). ConclusionsWomen take up numerous care paths following self-detection of a breast lesion. Empowering women on appropriate care pathways and expanding dedicated breast clinics where women to be first seen by an appropriate specialist are likely to improve timely breast cancer care in Sri Lanka.