Does the Addition of Intrathecal Baclofen Along with or After Soft-Tissue Hip Adductor Surgery Decrease the Need for Hip Reconstruction Compared with Soft-Tissue Surgery Alone for Children with Nonambulatory Cerebral Palsy?

Abstract

Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) is a well-known treatment option for cerebral palsy (CP) spasticity. The combination of soft-tissue release and ITB for spasticity is common. This study compared patients who had soft-tissue release before ITB (PRE-ITB), soft-tissue release at the same time as ITB (ST-ITB), and no ITB (NON-ITB) but had soft-tissue release at a similar age as PRE-ITB. Inclusion criteria were a spastic or mixed nonambulatory CP diagnosis, prior hip adductor surgery, no prior reconstructive surgery, and at least a five-year post-operative follow-up. Thirty hips were identified as PRE-ITB, 20 hips as ST-ITB, and 43 hips as NON-ITB. The primary outcome variables were the subsequent hip surgery during the study period and/or a migration percentage ≥ 50% at the final follow-up defined as "unsuccessful hip." The mean follow-up duration was 9.0years (SD 2.4) for PRE-ITB, 9.4 (SD 3.6) for ST-ITB, and 9.3 (SD 3) for NON-ITB. The odds of unsuccessful outcomes were not different between NON-ITB and PRE-ITB but were lower for the ST-ITB group. The need for subsequent osteotomies or revision adductor surgery was significantly higher in ST-ITB compared with PRE-ITB (p = 0.02) or NON-ITB (p = 0.015). The incidence of surgical site infection over the whole follow-up period was higher in ST-ITB (40%) compared with PRE-ITB (13.3%, p = 0.035) and NON-ITB (0, p < 0.001). The addition of tone management with ITB did not reduce the need for later hip surgery but did increase the risk for surgical site infection.