Does selective root canal retreatment preserve the tooth’s fracture resistance? An ex-vivo study

Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess the tooth’s fracture resistance when submitted to a selective root canal retreatment compared to the conventional approach.Methods33 intact permanent mandibular first molars were selected according to specific criteria. After teeth mounting, the primary root canal treatment was conducted and followed by thermo-mechanical aging procedures to mimic a few clinical conditions. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups (n = 11); a control group in which intact teeth were used and two experimental groups according to the retreatment approach: conventional non-surgical retreatment (Conventional-NSR), and selective non-surgical retreatment (Selective-NSR). Later, the teeth were submitted to a final thermo-mechanical aging procedure and tested regarding their fracture resistance (static fracture test). The maximum load to fracture was recorded as were the types of failure modes (repairable or non-repairable fracture). A proper statistical analysis was conducted, considering a significance level of 5%.ResultsThe Conventional-NSR group showed a mean failure load of 867.7 ± 108.9 N while the Selective-NSR group had 1106.8 ± 159.8 N (P = 0.012). Both retreatment groups showed significantly lower results when compared to the control group. Additionally, the Conventional-NSR group showed higher proportions of non-repairable fractures (54.5%) when compared to both the Selective-NSR (36.4%) and control (18.2%) groups.ConclusionsSelective root canal retreatment preserved the tooth’s fracture resistance compared to the conventional retreatment approach.Clinical trial numberNon-applicable. Conducting the current experiment was limited to obtaining approval from the local Research Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University (Committee No. 105, Registration No. 902, Date: 26/3/2024).