Does Salvage Chemotherapy Regimen Intensity Embark on Clearance of Bone Marrow Neuroblastoma?

Abstract

Introduction::Neuroblastoma (NBL) is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children. It accounts for 15% of the deaths from cancer in the pediatric age group. Approximately half of the newly diagnosed children are at “high risk” (HR) of treatment failure. This study aim was to evaluate the impact of salvage chemotherapy ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) versus TC (topotecan/cyclophosphamide) when administered to NBL HR patients having residual bone marrow disease after primary tumor control on the first line treatment regimen.Materials and Methods:The present retrospective study included two groups of eligible stage 4 NBL patients with persistent bone marrow disease. Group (1), 29 patients, received ICE whereas less intensive TC was administered to Group (2), 32 patients. Data analysis included epidemiological variables, pathology subtype, MYCN gene status, primary tumor response and their correlation with bone marrow disease clearance on each regimen.Results:A higher tendency of complete bone marrow clearance was reported in patients who received ICE compared to TC; 41.4% versus 25.0%, respectively. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.174).Conclusion:TC regimen appears to be a good alternative to ICE as salvage treatment in an attempt to clear NBL bone marrow residual, with the privilege of being less toxic and can be given on outpatient basis. Further randomized trials of larger study sample size with survival impact analysis are warranted.