Abstract

In coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), graft flow distal to a mild stenosis can compete with relatively preserved native flow through the stenosis and the competition can result in graft stenosis. In chronic total occlusion (CTO), coronary collateral circulation, which is essential to maintain myocardial viability distal to CTO, varies in extent among patients and the extent can be scored by Rentrop grade in coronary angiography. We investigated whether rich collateral circulation distal to CTO competes with distally anastomosed graft flow in association with Rentrop grade. Of 666 patients who underwent CABG from January 2001 to December 2012, 70 patients whose left internal thoracic artery (ITA) was grafted distal to CTO in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) were divided into three groups: Poor collaterals (Rentrop grades 0 and 1, Group P, n = 22), Moderate collaterals (grade 2, Group M, n = 23) and Rich collaterals (grade 3, Group R, n = 25). The intraoperative measurements of mean graft flow (MGF) and pulsatility index (PI) of left ITA grafts, early graft patency and long-term clinical outcomes were compared. The MGF and PI of left ITA grafts differed significantly among the three groups (P = 0.025 and P = 0.046, respectively). Lower Rentrop grade was associated with preferable results of higher MGF and lower PI. The graft flow pattern in Group P showed a significantly higher MGF (P = 0.020) and lower PI (P = 0.041) than those in Group R. All early postoperative coronary angiograms showed patent left ITA grafts. Serial echocardiographic evaluations, survival rates and cardiac event-free rates were comparable with the follow-up of 5.00 ± 3.11 years. Rich collateral circulation distal to CTO in LADs can potentially compete with graft flow, although the competition seems not to affect clinical outcomes probably due to the regression of collaterals surmounted by the graft flow. Rentrop grade is shown to certainly reflect the degree of collateral haemodynamic circulation distal to CTO and especially important to evaluate intraoperative graft flow appropriately, considering the possible phenomenon of graft flow competition.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.