Abstract

Mid-sized cities are usually considered in the literature to be shrinking cities. Some policies promote right-sizing and others promote revitalization. The relationship between land-use planning and mobility having been established, the present research issue is focused on whether a policy of revitalizing the centers of mid-sized cities is favorable to low-carbon mobility. Our study investigates commuting trips through two indicators: commuting trip distance and car modal share. The increase in total population, the increase in the number of jobs per resident, the decrease in the unemployment rate, the increase in the rate of executives, the increase in the rate of working people in the population and the decrease in the residential vacancy rate all come from the censuses of 2006 and 2016. Statistical models based on individuals in 113 mid-sized cities, in which sociodemographic variables are introduced, show that at the level of agglomerations, no indicator has a simultaneously positive effect in the center and in the urban periphery. No indicator is entirely positive or negative on GHG emissions from commuting trips. While the increase in GHG emissions from commuting trips between 2006 and 2016 is significant in mid-sized cities (18%), a shift toward shrinking city centers is insufficient to change this trajectory.

Highlights

  • Emissions from Commuting?.The dependency of residents not living in major cities on their private cars is a social and environmental issue that is increasingly central in urban policies [1]

  • Data from 12 household travel surveys in mid-sized cities were used to calculate coefficients to adjust the number of commuting loops (1.23), the share of working drivers among those who make the trip by car (94.7%) and the share of working people who have worked the day before (91.6%)

  • While the total population has increased by only 15% in mid-sized cities, 25% have experienced an increase in both working population and number of executives that is above the national average (Figure 2a,b,e)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As the link between urban forms of cities and GHG emissions from residents’ trips is no longer established, it is questionable whether the revitalization of city centers can reduce car use. The impact of urban dynamics on mobility behavior is much less studied, especially in mid-sized cities, which remain relatively unstudied. This study uses several indicators to define the activity of residents, such as the unemployment rate or the ratio of jobs in the working population It draws on data on 113 mid-sized cities from the 2006 and 2016 French national censuses to compare the changes in their vitality. A multivariate analysis isolates the impact of the vitality of central towns and its evolution over 10 years from the socio-demographic characteristics of households in each city

Study Area
Characterization of Revitalization
CO2 Emissions from Commuting Trips
Statistical Models
A Relative Decline in the Attractiveness of Mid-Sized Cities since 2006
Increase in CO2 Emissions from Commuting since 2006
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call