Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to compare the results of posterior stabilized and posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis. To find randomized controlled studies comparing the clinical outcomes of cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized systems, a computerized literature search was performed. To find more pertinent studies, the table of contents of four significant orthopaedic journals and the references part of two arthroplasty text books were examined. Finally, 1114 individuals' knees totaling 1265 were compared. A statistical analysis showed that posterior-stabilized knees had significantly greater flexion and range of motion, but no change in complication rates. This's clinical significance is still unknown. The surgeon's preference and comfort level with a particular design should determine which design is used.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
