Abstract

Compensatory stereotypes are the fundamental components of social perception, and competence and warmth are the two fundamental dimensions of social cognition. Previous studies have concluded that, to maintain belief in justice, the system justification motive leads people to believe that upper- and lower-class groups each have their own unique and mutually offsetting advantages and disadvantages (e.g., the rich have low warmth and the poor have high warmth). The present study introduced the variable of social justice perception (personal and systemic justice perception) and hypothesized that endowing upper-class groups with negative characteristics and lower-class groups with positive characteristics could enhance peopleโ€™s social justice perception. Participants were presented with vignettes that activated compensatory/non-compensatory stereotypes in four ways (compensatory competence, non-compensatory competence, compensatory warmth, non-compensatory warmth) regarding individuals described as rich and poor. Justice perception toward these individuals was then rated by the participants. The results showed that compensatory stereotypes triggered by system justification motives can affect the social justice perceptions of individuals to a certain extent. That is, perceiving the poor as warm and the rich as cold enhances perceived social justice, whereas perceiving the poor as competent and the rich as incompetent reduces perceived personal justice but does not affect perceived systemic justice. Especially in the context of the Chinese Confucian culture, which emphasizes warmth but ignores competence, the effect of compensatory stereotypes on perceptions of social justice underscores a cultural difference with the West that warmth is superior to competence. Further, compensatory stereotypes may be either beneficial for or detrimental to individuals of low socioeconomic status, and the results also question whether justice perception reflects the true fairness of society.

Highlights

  • Social Justice Perception and Its ClassificationSocial justice perception refers to individualsโ€™ evaluations of the degree of perceived social fairness; that is, individuals use โ€œsocial actualities as they should beโ€ as the criterion, and judge fairness or lack thereof based on whether the society conforms to this criterion (Jost and Kay, 2010)

  • Manipulation Check of the Activation Condition We ran a two-way mixed ANOVA to test the validity of stereotype activation for the competence and warmth ratings

  • A further simpleeffects analysis found that in the non-compensatory condition, the participantsโ€™ competence evaluation of the rich character (M = 6.17, SD = 0.53) was significantly higher than that of the poor character (M = 2.42, SD = 0.76), F(1, 82) = 472.69, p < 0.001, ฮท2 = 0.54, while in the compensatory condition, there was no significant difference between the participantsโ€™ competence evaluation of the rich character (M = 4.47, SD = 0.82) and that of the poor character (M = 4.36, SD = 0.78), F(1, 79) = 0.82, p = 0.382, ฮท2 = 0.02. This confirms that compensatory/ non-compensatory stereotypes were successfully activated for the competence ratings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social justice perception refers to individualsโ€™ evaluations of the degree of perceived social fairness; that is, individuals use โ€œsocial actualities as they should beโ€ as the criterion, and judge fairness or lack thereof based on whether the society conforms to this criterion (Jost and Kay, 2010). The first focuses on how specific events in the environment stimulate and influence the individualโ€™s personal experience of fairness; this is known as personal justice (Lipkus et al, 1996; Cropanzano et al, 2001). The second concerns the individualโ€™s general justice perception, which is an overall judgment of justice that is directed toward societal entities (e.g., individuals, organizations, or society in general), and does not refer to any specific event; this is known as systemic justice (Cropanzano et al, 2001; Kay and Jost, 2003). Personal justice affects judgments of systemic justice, which indirectly affects individualsโ€™ behaviors (Choi, 2008)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call