Abstract

This paper explores the potential “bright side” of overconfidence. We examine the effects of two types of overconfidence—overestimation and overprecision—on the contribution to the public good in a two-person threshold public good game. Experimental results show that the influence of overconfidence on contribution in public goods crucially depends on the agents’ type of preferences. Overestimation leads to a higher contribution by conditional cooperators, but a lower contribution by free-riders. Overprecision, in general, leads to a higher contribution by conditional cooperators, but has little effect on the contribution of free-riders.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.