Does oral appliance efficacy in treating obstructive sleep apnea depend on the appliance specialist's experience?

Abstract

In France, oral appliances (OAs)are the first-line treatment for moderate and second-line treatment for severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. In general, the sleep specialist refers his/her patient to the appliance specialist for the impressions and the fitting. However, is there a relationship between the volume of activity of the appliance specialist and the efficacy of this device? Our unit includes seven appliance otolaryngology specialists whose activities are highly variable (number of patients varying by a factor of almost 10). Data from a prospective follow-up registry of patients treated with anOA for moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome were studied, and differences in outcomes between practitioners in the team were sought. Among 859 patients, OAs significantly reducedthe apnea-hypopnea index. Even if the patients were not completely comparable from one practitioner to another, there was a significant heterogeneity in efficacy (complete or partial response of the apnea-hypopnea index and failure of OAs) between practitioners (p = 0.0038; 0.0011; 0.0007 respectively), with better results in practitioners with a higher level of OA activity. The findings suggest that it may be preferable to refer patients to OA practitioners who see a higher volume of patients with moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome treated with an OA.