Abstract
Collecting and analyzing patient safety event (PSE) reports is a key component to the improvement of patient safety yet report analysis has been challenging. Large language models (LLMs) may support analysis; however, PSE reports tend to be a hybrid of clinical and general language. We propose a data-driven evaluation strategy to assess LLM fit for report analysis. We identify target tokens and sentences from PSE reports and use perplexity to evaluate four LLMs comprehension of the target sentence. LLMs had statistically significantly different perplexity measures in six of seven event categories. Clinical models perform better with clinical narratives, often reported by nurses and physicians. General models perform better with colloquial language and communication themes. For LLMs to support PSE report analysis there must be a good fit between the language model and the nature of the text in reports. A single LLM approach may not be the most useful strategy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.