Abstract

This project examines the effect of an employee’s transgression on consumers’ judgments of company morality and reveals the influence of social identity. The moral implications of the employee’s action, for the company and for the customer, influenced reactions in the form of purchase intentions and judgments of the company’s morality. However, in contrast to the predictions of theories of moral judgment in the psychology literature, the company’s perceived responsibility for the employee’s moral or immoral action does not affect consumers’ moral judgments. Consistent with social identity theory, commitment to the company based on identification moderates the effect of information about an immoral employee action. In addition, a representative employee with a strong current association to the company affects weakly identified consumers’ moral judgments more than does a relatively low-level employee.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.