Does non-spherical humeral head with inlay glenoid re-center the glenohumeral joint?

Abstract

BackgroundTreatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) with Walch type B glenoid poses a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Although various techniques have been described, it is still a major concern in terms of management and long-term results. We hypothesized that total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) using a combination of non-spherical humeral head resurfacing (HHR) and inlay glenoid replacement would re-center the glenohumeral joint in patients with Walch type B glenoid without surgical correction of glenoid version. MethodsWe retrospectively screened patients who underwent TSA using a combination of non-spherical HHR and inlay glenoid replacement for primary glenohumeral OA with posteriorly subluxated humeral head (HH) (Walch Type B1, B2 and B3) between 2015 and 2019. Ratios of preoperative and postoperative HH subluxation were compared using Walch index and the point of contact ratio method. Two orthopedic surgeons performed radiographic measurements blinded to each other. Means of 2 independent measurements were included in the final analysis for each shoulder. We also screened for postoperative complications, dislocation events and radiographic loosening. ResultsInitial cohort included 49 patients. A total of 29 shoulders in 28 patients were eligible for screening. The numbers of shoulders with Walch type B1, B2, and B3 glenoids were 3, 22, and 4, respectively. Mean preoperative and postoperative Walch indices were 56.57 ± 6.08% and 49.47 ± 4.78%, respectively. The mean preoperative and postoperative point of contact ratios were 62.97 ± 8.45% and 50.08 ± 3.87%, respectively. The difference between preoperative and postoperative subluxation ratios was significant for both methods (P < .01). Inter-rater reliability was found to be good-excellent. The overall complication rate at a mean follow-up period of 37.79 months was 10.34% (3/29). One patient experienced deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (3.22%) on postoperative day 8. Two patients experienced infection (6.45%), one of which required a revision TSA (3.22%) at 19 months after surgery. No patient experienced shoulder dislocation and no loosening was detected on postoperative radiographs. ConclusionWhen coupled with an inlay glenoid component in patients with eccentric glenoid wear and posterior subluxation, glenohumeral re-centering was consistently observed in this challenging patient population without the use of joint correction or augmentation procedures. It will be important to follow the clinical outcomes over the long-term to determine whether these observations translate to better clinical results than other techniques currently employed to deal with eccentric erosion and posterior subluxation of the arthritic glenohumeral joint although recent published mid-term results suggest results equal to or better than previously reported results in literature with different reconstructive techniques Level of evidenceLevel IV; Retrospective cohort