Abstract

This article traces three decades of planning for a Canadian suburban downtown in Markham, Ontario, an early adopter of new urbanism. While leading new urbanist design firm Duany Plater-Zyberk & Co. (also known as DPZ) produced site plans for both Cornell and Markham Centre, much of the research attention on the implementation of new urbanism has focused on the Cornell development, where build-out began in the 1990s. Construction was delayed in Markham Centre until a decade later and continues today. The article is empirically grounded in a discourse analysis of policy, housing advertisements, and interviews with key actors in the planning and development process. New urbanism’s popular influence has led Fulton (2017) to argue that a ubiquitous urbanism now “just shows up.” Mainstreaming of new urbanist principles and the discursive framing of planning for Markham Centre as an ‘evolution’ further underscores this perception. Key actors describe an ‘organic’ planning process illustrating how the plan has changed in response to shifting market dynamics, political interests, and funding opportunities. The article explores the discourse about new urbanism and argues that in Markham Centre new urbanism has not just shown up, but has rather required a deliberate, collaborative, and adaptable process. Development that is transit oriented and attractive to knowledge economy workers underpins the contemporary vision. New urbanism as a label is losing relevance in Markham, where sprawl represents the past, new urbanism describes the legacy of 1990s planning, and a ‘real’ competitive urbanism is the vision for the future.

Highlights

  • New Urbanism from Fringe to CentreNew urbanism emerged 30 years ago as a movement encouraging good design as an alternative to sprawl

  • In this article I respond to these questions through an analysis of how planning and development discourse represents Markham Centre, in the Toronto metropolitan area, as a case study in contemporary new urbanism (Figure 1)

  • The Markham Centre case study provides an opportunity to examine how new urbanism has influenced planning policy and changed the built form within a single region and municipality over time, and how the new urbanist approach itself has adapted to shifting planning goals, market dynamics, and directions of key actors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

New urbanism emerged 30 years ago as a movement encouraging good design as an alternative to sprawl. Because of the lag between plan and development, this case study offers the opportunity to examine implementation of a new urban vision over an extended time period. The subtitle of this thematic issue is ‘the evolution of a global movement.’. In this article I examine how key actors in the planning and development process mobilize a discourse of ‘evolution’ to characterize the changing vision for Markham Centre. I argue that counter-sprawl planning strategies, including new urbanism, have gone from the exceptional to the mainstream in Markham and the surrounding region; new urbanism far from “just shows up” as Fulton Sprawl is the past, new urbanism is legacy, and competitive urbanism is the future

New Urbanism’s Heterogeneous History
Producing New Urbanism
Method
New Urbanism Mainstreamed in Canadian Planning Principles and Policy
Markham Centre’s ‘Evolution’: Discourses of Origin and Change
Is the Label ‘New Urbanism’ Still Relevant?
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call