Does needle size matter? Effects of micro-hypodermic needle injections of botulinum toxin type A in patients with hemifacial spasm

Abstract

IntroductionBotulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) injections are the first-line treatment for primary hemifacial spasms (HFS), but require frequent painful injections. Although micro-hypodermic needles are commonly used for aesthetic BoNT/A injections to lessen pain and bruising, their benefits in HFS remain unclear. ObjectiveTo compare side effects of BoNT/A injection, specifically pain and bruising, between primary HFS patients who received injections using micro-hypodermic needles (34-G) and those using standard needles (30-G). MethodsThis cross-over, double-blind, randomised controlled trial involved HFS patients who received BoNT/A injections using either a 34-G or 30-G needle at two visits 12 weeks apart. Primary outcomes, pain and bruising were assessed immediately after injection using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (Thai version, SF-MPQ). Bruise assessment was also conducted one week after each injection. Secondary outcomes involved comparing efficacy of BoNT/A between the two types of needles and assessing other complications beyond pain and bruising. Results65 HFS patients (47 women and 18 men; mean age 59.46 ± 11.48 years; mean disease duration 5.86 ± 4.16 years) were included in the study. Patients who received 34-G needle injections reported significantly reduced pain, as indicated by VAS, total SF-MPQ scores, and bruise scores, compared to those who received 30-G needle injections (p < 0.001, each). There were no differences in efficacy or occurrence of other complications associated with BoNT/A between the two needle types. ConclusionIn HFS patients, BoNT/A injections using micro-hypodermic needles resulted in reduced pain and bruising, compared to standard needles, while maintaining similar BoNT/A benefits.