Abstract
Different from the majority of research studying minority shareholder activism (MSA) on shareholder side, this study investigates the impact of MSA from the perspective of creditors. Based on annual data of listed firms on SSE and SZSE from 2010 to 2020, we find that MSA significantly mitigates corporate default risk through two ways: the “supervision” way and “good advice” way. Such inhibitory effect is strengthened by favorable institutional environment, board secretary concurrently serving as other executives, and board secretary response. Furthermore, we find that the supervision role of MSA is substitution for those of analysts and institutional investors. Our findings provide evidence for strengthening the protection of minority shareholders and encouraging their participation in firm affairs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
