Abstract
Minimal responses are the linguistic devices that are mainly used by women. They are typically regarded as cooperative enhancers. Unlike women, men use delayed minimal responses that show a lack of support, attention, and interest. Nevertheless, this paper addresses the issue of men’s language and the use of minimal responses as a strategy to build conversations cooperatively. The data of this study comprise 180 minutes of audio-recorded transcribed conversations of four groups of men who were either classmates, close friends, or both. The frequency count of minimal responses is tabulated quantitatively, and the conversation analysis approach is applied to reflect qualitative findings. The findings indicate that the stereotypical linguistic features which are assigned to men need to be reconsidered and challenged in various settings. In this study, men are as highly capable as women in selectively showing their support and interest, particularly to the issues that matter to them whenever required. This paper also references the social distance and the topic of conversation as the significant effects of minimal responses. Keywords: conversation topic; cooperation; men’s talk; minimal responses; social distance
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.