Abstract
In social enterprises, which are hybrid organizations that create social and economic values, the role of leaders is important to achieve goals. However, prior research on social enterprises overlooked the importance of a leader, and some research that considered leadership was insufficient to concern the characteristics of social enterprises. This study aims to find whether there is no problem in applying the leadership emphasized in a profit-firm to a non-profit-firm such as a social enterprise, since social enterprises pursue economic and social objectives simultaneously. To do so, we examined the effects of four leadership styles (transactional leadership, transformational leadership, servant leadership, and entrepreneurship) used mainly in commercial enterprises on the performance of social enterprises. In review of prior studies, it was assumed that transactional leadership would not have a significant effect on performance, and the other three kinds of leadership were hypothesized to have a positive effect on performance. Additionally, to clarify the relationship between leadership and performance of social enterprises, leader trust and calling were considered as mediators. Using the list of Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency, questionnaires were distributed via e-mail to employees of 318 social enterprises located in Seoul, and 251 copies were collected and analyzed. The results of this study show that transactional leadership only affects economic performance and does not show significance with the rest of the variables as was expected. Transformational leadership had positive relationships with variables considered as performances of social enterprises, and the mediating effects of leader trust and calling were also verified. Entrepreneurship was positively related to three performances of social enterprises, but servant leadership had a positive relationship with organizational commitment. This study contributes to highlighting the need for research to find appropriate leadership styles that focus on the characteristics of social enterprises.
Highlights
The interest in social enterprises, companies established to achieve social goals, continues to grow as the community demands that companies more actively implement social responsibility and ethics
Entrepreneurship was positively related to three performances of social enterprises, but servant leadership had a positive relationship with organizational commitment
This study aimed to see the effects of major leadership styles that have been in the spotlight on social enterprise performance
Summary
The interest in social enterprises, companies established to achieve social goals, continues to grow as the community demands that companies more actively implement social responsibility and ethics. Unlike for−profit companies that are concerned only with economic profits, social enterprises must constantly have balance and tension between economic profits and social goals. Smith et al [4] insisted that the social and commercial sides of a social enterprise are not isolated from one another. They drew on paradox research to build a theory about the challenges and associated skills for effectively managing the tensions emerging from the juxtaposition of social mission and business outcomes. There is an increasing need for research on how to successfully run social enterprises
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
