Does K-selection imply prudent predation?

Abstract

Competition models are derived from predator-prey models. The population parameters r and K are thus expressed as composites of quantities measuring properties of the individual. This enables us to show that the idea that K-selection maximizes K is not valid as a general principle and is equivalent to asserting that selection on predators leads to prudent predation. Models of density-dependent selection, which predict maximization of K, implicitly assume no evolution of hunting efficiency. A valid general principle instead states that K-selection minimizes the equilibrium density of prey or food resource. It is then shown that the phenotypic profiles of r- and K-selected organisms are often identical. They diverge only if there are genetic constraints of a particular kind between the various evolving traits. Furthermore, divergence is in opposite direction to that which is commonly expected.