Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic background has traditionally been the most important determinant of an individual’s social advantage. Studies have used social class and opportunities based on parental income and education to predict such advantage. There is limited evidence that stratification mechanisms other than socioeconomic background can play an important role. The purpose of the study is to examine the influence of the traditional factors (income and education) of family background on students’ social attachment styles compared to other background variables (civil status and number of children). Methods: We used the Vulnerable Attachment Style Questionnaire as an outcome measure to assess students’ social attachment advantage. As a point of departure, we use theories of social psychology to categorize social relations in terms of secure or insecure bonding, respectively. Results: A cross-sectional data set of 912 university students from five European countries was used. With respect to social attachment, the likelihood of being a student with robust relations increases by 23% if the students have high-income parents. Students with robust relations also have a decreased likelihood of poor body self-esteem by 19% when compared with other students. Conclusions: Stratification mechanisms other than social class, such as parental characteristics, civil status, and number of siblings, all affect the privileged students’ social relations.

Highlights

  • Young people today live in an era of late modernity that is characterized by a high degree of individualism and reflexivity [1,2,3]

  • The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of family background factors on students’ social attachment styles compared to other background variables

  • Our results indicate that family characteristics other than traditional social class affect students’ social relations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Young people today live in an era of late modernity that is characterized by a high degree of individualism and reflexivity [1,2,3]. This notion of reflexivity helps to explain how young people change their position in the social system of which they are a part and shape their own identity through the definition, for example, of norms, preferences, likes, dislikes and attitudes. Students can establish secure bonds if they have balanced relations that are neither too dependent nor too independent of other people. Results: A cross-sectional data set of 912 university students from five

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call