Abstract

Children usually use the external and physical features of characters in movies or stories as a means of categorizing them quickly as being either good or bad/evil. This categorization is probably done by means of heuristics and previous experience. However, the study of this fast processing is difficult in children. In this paper, we propose a new experimental paradigm to determine how these decisions are made. We used illustrations of characters in folk tales, whose visual representations contained features that were compatible or incompatible with the moral identity of the characters. Sixteen children between 8 and 10 years old participated in the experiment. We measured their electrodermal activity when they were listening to the story and looking at pictures of the characters. Results revealed a higher increase in skin conductance when the illustrations showed a moral condition that was incompatible with the actions of a character than when they showed one that was compatible. These results suggest that children make fast decisions about the moral identity of characters based on their physical features. They open up new possibilities in the study of the processing of moral decisions in children.

Highlights

  • A key skill in social interactions is to determine who deserves to be trusted and who does not

  • We present a new experimental paradigm to study the perception of moral identity and its change through experimental manipulation in children

  • The Skin Conductance Response (SCR) pattern was compatible with very fast response, supporting the idea that children very quickly realized the incongruence between the image and the story

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A key skill in social interactions is to determine who deserves to be trusted and who does not. The social intuitionist model proposes that moral judgement is closer to an emotion, or emotional intuition, than to reasoned, rational processing and that such judgements appear suddenly and effortlessly based on feelings and intuitions, while rational arguments are just post hoc justifications (Greene and Haidt, 2002). Rationalist models have emphasised how people develop selfmoral identity and moral schemas. Under this perspective, moral judgement is a moral reasoning, and the relationship between moral judgement and moral action (Kohlberg and Candee, 1984) is complex and influenced by many variables such as educational opportunities (Stephens, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call