Does intermittent supply result in hydraulic transients? Mixed evidence from two systems

Abstract

Abstract Pressure transients can cause severe damage in continuous water supply pipe networks, but little is known about pressure transients in intermittent networks. Published examples of high-frequency pressure monitoring in intermittent networks are lacking. Intermittent supply can be caused by poor network condition and is associated with delivering less water, less frequently, and with poorer quality than continuous supply. Given the frequency with which intermittent systems drain, fill, and change supply regimes, pressure transients have been hypothesized to be common and to be one mechanism by which intermittent supply further degrades network condition. We present supply start-up data from two very different intermittent systems: a low-pressure, intermittent network in Delhi, India, and a higher-pressure intermittent network in Arraiján, Panama. Across monitoring locations at both sites, we did not detect substantial pressure transients due to pipe filling. In Arraiján, pump start-ups, pump shutdowns, and pipe bursts were associated with potentially problematic transients. We conclude that pipe filling in intermittent supply does not always result in concerning pressure transients. The largest risks to pipe conditions we observed were due to pumping changes in close succession; hence, we recommend that utilities operating intermittent (and continuous) systems leave adequate dissipation time between changes in pump operation.