Abstract
This study examines the implications of mandatory shareholder approval for chief executive officer (CEO) compensation in Israel, following the “say-on-pay” (SOP) framework. Through the utilization of a binding voting framework, shareholders evaluate the effectiveness of CEO compensation structures. A survey involving 106 Israeli directors occupying diverse board positions, including external, independent, regular, and chair positions, reveals that external directors demonstrate a greater appreciation for institutional votes. This highlights their acknowledgment of institutional perspectives and underscores the critical significance of fostering effective communication between boards and institutional stakeholders to strengthen corporate governance frameworks. The study emphasizes the pivotal role of dialogue in enhancing governance structures through a nuanced examination of challenges in executive compensation governance
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
