Abstract

The paper examines whether auditors’ identification with the organization or with the profession will influence the use of outcome knowledge when reviewing audits. In addition, the study examines whether the conflict between organizational identity and professional identity influences evaluators’ use of outcome knowledge. The study participants consisted of 63 auditing experts in managerial ranks. Auditors completed an instrument containing randomized audit review scenarios developed to evaluate the effects of identification and outcome knowledge on decisions. Results showed that organizational identification can minimize the effect of outcome knowledge on decisions while professional identification results in an increase in biases.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.