Abstract

How does linguistic structure affect children’s acquisition of early number word meanings? Previous studies have tested this question by comparing how children learning languages with different grammatical representations of number learn the meanings of labels for small numbers, like 1, 2, and 3. For example, children who acquire a language with singular-plural marking, like English, are faster to learn the word for 1 than children learning a language that lacks the singular-plural distinction, perhaps because the word for 1 is always used in singular contexts, highlighting its meaning. These studies are problematic, however, because reported differences in number word learning may be due to unmeasured cross-cultural differences rather than specific linguistic differences. To address this problem, we investigated number word learning in four groups of children from a single culture who spoke different dialects of the same language that differed chiefly with respect to how they grammatically mark number. We found that learning a dialect which features “dual” morphology (marking of pairs) accelerated children’s acquisition of the number word two relative to learning a “non-dual” dialect of the same language.

Highlights

  • Humans have a unique ability to create precise symbolic representations of natural number, and to use these symbols in the service of mathematics

  • We investigated number word learning in children learning two non-dual dialects of Slovenian, and compared them to children learning two Slovenian dialects in which the dual is habitually used

  • Many children learning all four dialects eventually came to comprehend the dual, those exposed to non-dual dialects appeared to comprehend it later in development, and did not hear it frequently enough that it was adopted in their own spontaneous speech

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans have a unique ability to create precise symbolic representations of natural number, and to use these symbols in the service of mathematics. This ability emerges early in life, when children begin learning verbal labels like one, two, three, four, five, etc. Members of groups that lack such words, like the Pirahã and Mundurucu, are unable to perform precise numerical computations for large numbers [1]; [2]; [3]; [4]. Number Word Learning in Dual and Non-Dual Dialects of Slovenian

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call