Abstract

The village fund allocation is a policy strategy of the government of Indonesia for development in rural areas. Each village has funds sourced from the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget. The uniqueness of this strategy is the community’s involvement in determining the allocation expenditure of funds. Therefore, the program is carried out in line with the needs of the community. Rural areas generally rely on agriculture, which has lower productivity than other sectors, so they need support to achieve inclusive growth. This study analyzes whether the village fund allocation is a pro-poor, pro-equality, and pro-job policy. It uses secondary data from the Ministry of Finance, Statistics Indonesia, and the National Development Planning Agency from the period of 2015–2019 for 33 provinces of Indonesia. The data were analyzed using panel regression with three models: income inequality, poverty levels, and unemployment rates. Other variables supporting inclusive growth, including economic growth, infrastructure, and the expansion of public services, were examined. The results showed that government expenditure through village fund allocation encourages inclusive growth as a policy that is pro-poor and pro-job but not pro-equality. Economic growth, on the other hand, reduces income inequality but increases poverty. Economic infrastructure increases income inequality, while increasing access to public services reduces poverty levels and increases unemployment.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe contribution of agriculture towards economic development has decreased and shifted to the secondary and tertiary sectors

  • Statistics Indonesia; (3) the unemployment rate (Un), obtained from Statistics Indonesia; (4) economic growth (g), based on 2010 constant prices obtained from Statistics Indonesia; (5) village fund allocation (VF); obtained from the Indonesian Ministry of Finance; (6) economic infrastructure (Ei), measured by the economic infrastructure index obtained from the inclusive development data from the Indonesian National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas); and (7) the expansion of access and opportunities (Ac), obtained from the inclusive development data from the Indonesian National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas)

  • The achievements of the construction and rehabilitating infrastructure in 2015–2019 supporting community economic activities show a construction of 231,709 km of village roads; bridges spanning a total of 1,327,069 m; 10,480 village market units; 6312 units of boat moorings; 4859 of small farm reservoirs; and 65,626 irrigation units, with village-owned enterprises engaging in 39,226 activities (Ministry of Village n.d.)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The contribution of agriculture towards economic development has decreased and shifted to the secondary and tertiary sectors. Since agricultural communities hardly enjoy inclusive growth, the Indonesian government is implementing a policy to develop rural areas through special village fund transfers, which comprise four priority programs. These include improving the quality of human resources, developing post-harvest industries, enhancing rural-urban connectivity, and developing leading products for each village. The fund allocation is determined at the village level through deliberation involving the community, known as the Village Development Plan Deliberation (Musrembang Desa). The community determines the direction of the fund allocation according to their needs, implying a bottomup planning model

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call