Abstract
Abstract. The Repository Site Selection Act can only be successfully implemented when it is embedded in a comprehensive context of gentle regulation. The Repository Site Selection Act accentuates not only options for solving conflicts prior to judicial legal protection. The Act also furthermore features supplementary, informal forms of public participation. Diverse examples of encounter, contention and discourse, all of which are resources for solving conflict, as forms of gentle regulation are presented (national support board, participation representative, development of public participation, particularly informal public participation, compensation and socioeconomic development, political communication and storytelling, restorative justice, historical analyses, narrative salon). This perspective has so far had very little discussion. The (legal) discussion is concentrated on possibilities for legal protection in court. The attempt at gentle regulation needs further mediation and discussions if the innovative approach in the repository site selection procedure should be successfull. The starting point is a jurisprudence, which questions success and effectiveness of regulations and discusses various ways and approaches.
Highlights
This perspective has so far had very little discussion
The discussion is concentrated on possibilities for legal protection in court
Ausgangspunkt ist eine Rechtswissenschaft, die nach Erfolg und Wirksamkeit von Regulierung fragt und unterschiedliche Wege und Ansätze diskutiert
Summary
This perspective has so far had very little discussion. The (legal) discussion is concentrated on possibilities for legal protection in court.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
