Abstract
AbstractThe paper examines the relationship between financial fraud and a firm's implied equity cost. Using a U.S. sample of 15,552 firm‐year observations, we find a positive relationship between a firm's financial fraud and implied equity cost. Consistent with the monitoring channel, financial fraud increases a firm's equity cost in the presence of higher external and internal monitoring in terms of higher analyst coverage and institutional ownership. Our results are robust to alternate specifications and tests, including alternate definitions of equity cost, financial fraud, and other endogeneity concerns. The findings negate the business case of financial fraud by showing that financial fraud tends to enhance equity cost, thereby lowering the firm's value.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
